From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Jan 20 18:09:10 2010 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk Subject: Re: [MiNT] mintlib rpm fix From: Alan Hourihane To: Miro Kropacek Cc: Vincent =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rivi=E8re?= , mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: References: <4B5641FF.2000108@freesbee.fr> <1263952674.14483.20.camel@server.demon.co.uk> <1264027037.17641.2.camel@server.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:06:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1264028762.17641.3.camel@server.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 23:56 +0100, Miro Kropacek wrote: > > math.h shouldn't be deleted from mintlib as parts of mintlib > use code > from it. We just shouldn't install mintlibs version, as the > libm would > provide it. > Who says I want to install it? There are two types of installation: > 1. /usr/include and 2. for rpm build. If you say we can't include it > in source distribution, we can't build RPM from official sources, only > from CVS because 'make dist' wont include math.h into official source > distribution. In my opinion, this is not good. > > I think the solution is move math.h into EXTRAFILES (i.e. not > MISCFILES), right? Yes. Alan.