From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jan 15 12:42:59 2010 From: "Ronald J. Hall" To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Daily freemint kernel builds Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:46:21 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <0012bc96.01ad1d1cd68e@mail.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001151246.21602.darklord@suddenlink.net> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: darklord@suddenlink.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Friday 15 January 2010 09:24 am, Miro Kropacek wrote: > This isn't necessarily SDRAM issue, it can be cache issue inside the CPU > for example. As Alan said, this is how it is. Remember CT60 was projected / > tested / developed for 66 MHz, everything above is just a bonus. You might > want to try to play with higher values (some people have reported 75 MHz as > their working frontier) but you know, better 100% working 66 MHz than > maybe-something-silently-not-working XX MHz ;-) 66 MHz was widely accepted > as standard setup, i.e. all demos/intros are optimized for 66 MHz anyway. 95mhz is the top limit for mine - I tried for 100mhz, (was so hoping for a triple-digit speed Falcon!), but it caused no end of problems. What model 060 CPU do you have - IIRC, Rodolphe posted the numbers on his website for the models that were fairly reliable for bumping up the speed. Do you have the CTCM? Makes it so easy to play with the speeds... -- Welcome To DarkForce! www.darkforce.org "The Fuji Lives.!" An Atari SW/HW based BBS - Telnet:darkforce-bbs.dyndns.org