From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jan 1 17:07:36 2010 Message-ID: <4B3E71C5.9070803@online.no> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:05:57 +0100 From: Jo Even Skarstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "mint@lists.fishpool.fi" Subject: Re: [MiNT] [Mint-cvs] [FreeMiNT CVS] freemint/sys/sockets/inet4 References: <201001011533.o01FXxwV032211@mail.sparemint.org> <1262366629.16683.1686.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <4B3E336F.5010502@atari.org> <4B3E349B.9030100@freesbee.fr> <4B3E3C25.1000602@atari-source.org> <4B3E486B.2010507@atari-source.org> <4B3E5FD9.9040508@atari-source.org> In-Reply-To: <4B3E5FD9.9040508@atari-source.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Mark Duckworth wrote: > Ok, I am able to get maximum free memory on 14mb falcon afer mint of > 11,176K. A make distclean runs out of memory even. So there is no way > to build freemint on a stock falcon with gcc 2.95.3 even. I don't remember the details, but under certain circumstances I ran out of memory on my 32Mb Afterburner while building MiNT with 2.95. So I'm not surprised that it doesn't work on a 14Mb Falcon. Anyway, gcc is so slow that it's not practically usable on a plain Falcon. Why are we using this compiler? Because of the lack of alternatives? Jo Even