From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Jan 7 05:30:21 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YHmDOILhamQ47qIWmHc1N7V1UXUJfPdBro9SZJ+YcP0=; b=g5+3xMJeqUJIhRud5axmRFYg5G6N2NR79WpnlrTz20uQ2iMMvpRZfiyjVZFcE1p0Sm 1SD9CcRmP48WLeuYA9/Z5bXfHuz1EuvXZur4jLrltnQ1HNnL0MqyBjE43DyBz4erZhyI 23B1KDEowfgUfZ4yl0x4Q2q3GEou3+omAvW4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BEjvllchroHNuxfw5dZZ5hW9KIE/wHzmfW5aFDs/l2jMatCXkxKbtiqF7ydsKj+juf d98UmUczPDNwiIV/AFpQjyznEB3Fy9QTJOi2qZyKAiOnAh6th86SWhK9qI8xmj8xAIsK 1ZviRWwd/5jJFrJc7W+LqZYL//FQ+8kzxSf60= Message-ID: <4B45B716.9080408@freesbee.fr> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:27:34 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint Subject: Re: [MiNT] C++ cout bug References: <4B454BA5.6010201@atari-source.org> <4B45B063.1010504@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Miro Kropacek a écrit : > Hmm, this is strange, I'm 100% positive my binaries are always output of > combo newest binutils + newest gcc, so those on my site are for sure > build with binutils 2.20. Is there any way how to verify it? Sure. I provided a testcase with my patch for this bug. http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4250&action=view The file p3041data.s is the source to provide to as, and p3041data.d is the expected objdump result. Since your binutils version is 2.20 it is unlikely to have the bug. Maybe Mark has messed up the libraries from several distributions ? And the first thing to do: Mark, give us exactly your test program, we will tell you if it works for us or not. -- Vincent Rivière