From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Jan 7 15:01:01 2010 Message-ID: <4B463D08.9000101@online.no> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:59:04 +0100 From: Jo Even Skarstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] QED References: <201001072153.54168.oak@helsinkinet.fi> In-Reply-To: <201001072153.54168.oak@helsinkinet.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Eero Tamminen wrote: >>> c) Don't integrate everything into one binary, but create several tools >>> and tie them together with a clever protocol. >>> >>> Personally I'd prefer (c). > > I like (c) too, but what about extending AHCC instead of QED? That is a great idea, but those who prefer other compilers might not agree. Personally I would love to see the AHCC IDE extended. I still have to get used to the toolbox-concept, but other than that AHCC is a really good IDE. If it had some tools to visualize the code structure (to aid navigation) it would be almost perfect for my needs. Jo Even