From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sat Jan  9 14:58:35 2010
Message-ID: <4B48DF8B.2050903@online.no>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:56:59 +0100
From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES+nvdi-et400
References: <BIEHKLLGMNEPEMKHDPAIKEHCEMAA.mintlist@mr2.net>
In-Reply-To: <BIEHKLLGMNEPEMKHDPAIKEHCEMAA.mintlist@mr2.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: joska@online.no
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Mark Nias wrote:

> can the code/technique be compaired between xaaes and n.aes find out why
> xaaes has a problem?

Have you tried N.AES on your TT? With MiNT 1.16 or 1.17?

Jo Even