From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Fri Jan 15 10:56:57 2010
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=WjS+B/zKrEwXOeebdRufqYK4e1rR2e8qbTvV7CF0JMw=;
        b=hnuaM9mBnicmAlds/si2a961JhLX0KoWKrZDFp96+RwDDjBU3M5vOxGIsGEPOs6X94
         qsgUB9sQAswNGKYDTDLDjvN/8L8uDX0Bsc8DqcQ2CHMLDuc6QmXba8CW1sHlgmuC94Xk
         vQV+XHg1p5N3tfbY9jmiqA++4uXUU7hHJEJgQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vlmhmm9qGtf8kbLJmJb7LbqAcR/zDCXvir502zez+uIWir6BDWTyqoxfW+VHv0R91J
         ljD5Sh8y6E9w5ieNDeK0pNvfN69dvAqgYVnMhogKbd3M6lqtqH7F43E4m+8JW6qNFWFy
         aFGXMWS0mfpBuq6n18Tep8vs77wzGZXCBuNDU=
Message-ID: <4B508F3F.3040509@freesbee.fr>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:52:31 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MiNT Mailing List <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] gcc 68000 vs 68020-60 vs 68060 comparison
References: <c6533ef61001150424na19f697u2036f9a5942109ad@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c6533ef61001150424na19f697u2036f9a5942109ad@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Miro Kropacek a écrit :
> or mintlib is
> not very good testcase (since it uses a lot of external stuff)

As a good real-world benchmark, I propose you to try bzip2.
It is a quite small program, easy to recompile. At runtime, it is
notoriously slow on any machine. You can try to compress a file of some
size, let's say 1 MB, and see how much time it takes. You should try
with a file big enough no not be annoyed by the speed of disk access.
Then you can rebuild bzip2 with the different CPU options, and see the
timing differences.

-- 
Vincent Rivière