From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Jan 16 09:22:40 2010 Message-ID: <4B51CB17.1040801@freesbee.fr> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:20:07 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmluY2VudCBSaXZpw6hyZQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] rpm brace expansion References: <4B4F9F55.9060205@atari-source.org> <4B4FA150.1050900@freesbee.fr> <4B51CA3D.4040707@atari-source.org> In-Reply-To: <4B51CA3D.4040707@atari-source.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100115-2, 15/01/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o0GEMeCQ014193 Mark Duckworth wrote: > On modern platforms (all of them) sh is just a symlink to bash. My > assumption is that this is implicitly required for an (rpm) build > machine but I will not setup the packages this way as a user may want to > save the memory. Furthermore, recently I made a test where I saw that running makefiles on EasyMiNT with bash is significantly slower than with sh. -- Vincent Rivière