From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jan 29 16:36:38 2010 Message-ID: <4B635404.4000706@freesbee.fr> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:32:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] __Unwind_Resume References: <4B6147EA.4060400@freesbee.fr> <4B61F646.6050100@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100129-1, 29/01/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o0TLac38029820 Miro Kropacek wrote: > I was able to compile zView against newest libraries > (freetype, fixed windom/ldg) with very little changes. It's very MP > unfriendly (VA protocol I guess + 2-3 other places where it crashes) but > except this it works really nice. I was able to open PDFs, huge JPGs, > ... what a cool software! Very good ! Your patches should be included in some official place. We are currently seeing more and more software being recompiled with modern compilers and newest libraries... It means they are alive :-) If some package is recompilable with GCC 4.x, it means it will be possible to recompile it easily for ColdFire, if it does not use assembler. > The question is: which exception model is good for us ? > The answer is probably "the same as GCC 2.x", as usual. > I don't know which choice had been made for it. > > Isn't there any way how to check it? (from src.rpm patch, looking into > binary for some string, ...) Easy... but lazy. I will make some tests and start a new thread for that. -- Vincent Rivière