From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Jan 30 09:18:07 2010 Message-ID: <4B643ECF.8050503@atari-source.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:14:39 -0500 From: Mark Duckworth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Correct steps after installing EasyMiNT References: <4B60C22C.1010204@abbuc.de> <4B60CDA3.7020603@abbuc.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080103040108010706040301" X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mduckworth@atari-source.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080103040108010706040301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See this is exactly why I asked people to let me know what RPM's you are building. Now we have two 0.59.0 RPM builds. Thanks, Mark On 1/30/10 4:55 AM, Miro Kropacek wrote: > > May i ask you for your build? Or is it on your site already? (Will > look in a few minutes) > > It isn't but I've uploaded it here (still I'd like to see official > RPM, not only mine): > > http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-0.59.0-1.src.rpm > http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm > http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-debug-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm > http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-profile-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm > http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-devel-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm > > They are compiled on easymint + gcc 2.95/binutils 2.13 + mintlib 0.58, > just to make sure it was made as 'official' as possible, i.e. no gcc4 yet. > > Hmm as I'm looking at the content, we should probably finally remove > that stupid 'xxx020.a' symlinks, it only pollutes /usr/lib... > > I would like to compile stuff from linux sources. For example, i > prefer Rhapsody IRC over irssi. I wasn't able to compile Rhapsody > myself, somone on #atariscne luckily was. On eof the programs i > want to use on Atari (its an X11 app) needs GSL math pack (or NASM > which is for x86 only). GSL needs gcc newer than 3.1, on my > previous install even that didn't work, although i had gcc 4.4.2 > (probably had wrong binutils back then). > > Console stuff is mostly OK but beware, X11 is very, very outdated on > Atari, not to speak it's only kind of fast hack, so you can bump to > more troubles than you've ever imagined :) > > -- > MiKRO / Mystic Bytes > http://mikro.atari.org --------------080103040108010706040301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See this is exactly why I asked people to let me know what RPM's you are building. Now we have two 0.59.0 RPM builds.

Thanks,
Mark

On 1/30/10 4:55 AM, Miro Kropacek wrote:

May i ask you for your build? Or is it on your site already? (Will look in a few minutes)

It isn't but I've uploaded it here (still I'd like to see official RPM, not only mine):

http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-0.59.0-1.src.rpm
http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm
http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-debug-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm
http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-profile-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm
http://mikro.umpc.sk/private/mintlib-devel-0.59.0-1.m68kmint.rpm

They are compiled on easymint + gcc 2.95/binutils 2.13 + mintlib 0.58, just to make sure it was made as 'official' as possible, i.e. no gcc4 yet.

Hmm as I'm looking at the content, we should probably finally remove that stupid 'xxx020.a' symlinks, it only pollutes /usr/lib...

I would like to compile stuff from linux sources. For example, i prefer Rhapsody IRC over irssi. I wasn't able to compile Rhapsody myself, somone on #atariscne luckily was. On eof the programs i want to use on Atari (its an X11 app) needs GSL math pack (or NASM which is for x86 only). GSL needs gcc newer than 3.1, on my previous install even that didn't work, although i had gcc 4.4.2 (probably had wrong binutils back then).

Console stuff is mostly OK but beware, X11 is very, very outdated on Atari, not to speak it's only kind of fast hack, so you can bump to more troubles than you've ever imagined :)

--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

--------------080103040108010706040301--