From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Jan 9 13:27:17 2010 From: "Mark Nias" To: Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES+nvdi-et400 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:23:35 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Importance: Normal X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=1ggfb5FlKZQUfF3vzm9UBYZ2uTfLsbs/8dSljwg5+mE= c=1 sm=0 a=W_deRxVvpNHWnaGl5g4A:9 a=1TRVcgDK22CUKMH1KNlfuZzqescA:4 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mintlist@mr2.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: > -----Original Message----- > From: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi > [mailto:mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi]On Behalf Of Jo Even Skarstein > Sent: 09 January 2010 08:46 > To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi > Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES+nvdi-et400 > > > Helmut Karlowski wrote: > > > The problem seems to be that under nvdi-et4000 a physical wk > can only be > > opened by a prog that is run directly out of the AUTO-folder > or from the > > atari-desktop. > > N.AES works just fine with NVDI ET4000. Used it for years on my TT. > N.AES is started directly by MiNT. However, I never got past > 1.15 on the TT. can the code/technique be compaired between xaaes and n.aes find out why xaaes has a problem? mark