From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Thu Feb  4 02:47:54 2010
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=DXZhAHGq7gf2qE7FYrAoGdnPsbcCSnhYvqm0fd/Lmtk=;
        b=qN2OGAdol6/LNBFzf/+O/Bp0C79sZXxwz10ysnj2b2AlaK9KzaLHwO0Q9YHe8kGmHb
         UpQKSrJQSblR/jZ0lsw6gQFiL+v+MfLNaQU92j3rljx8qOe686io+kytIaOrkFSXP6PR
         zWkE3WUyZWybrXIlCRR0b6lsOZE5/QrgCGl/M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=D3w3Bu5zfzQJlCfcfqpz+Q+lU+jLuGf6LGUEpwt2qliQA0Uo4XXVDzjqRDBf7557gz
         ffg1YbTmP1pNv+6dvWOvyYxXDYBdI10/gsmhFJCxRUwxDPT0sk3w2e1hdh1zB4ul1uE6
         RCmv0Hf72aY438oQFfvmA5P2jG+PeTYg1QOXg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B69F3D9.5020009@online.no>
References: <00033c8b.019e5d1c981c@mail.gmx.net>
	 <op.u7kkomymofd6j1@descaro.cpe.ish> <4B69EE78.4020305@online.no>
	 <op.u7kniqceofd6j1@descaro.cpe.ish> <4B69F3D9.5020009@online.no>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:45:56 -0600
Message-ID: <11a6f2b11002032345t70af749du78457068a4360c8f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Daily freemint kernel builds
From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: paul.wratt@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no> wrote:
> Helmut Karlowski wrote:
>
>> I don't know much about that protocol but then I'd prefer to remove any
>> blocks when the fileselector is called, seems more efficient: a few new
>> lines of code vs. a new protocol ...
>
> True, but the big difference is that the Selectric protocol allows
> multiple files to be selected. Personally I find myself using drag'n
> drop (or the AV-protocol) more than the fileselector, so for me it
> doesn't make much difference :-)
>
> Jo Even
>
Also, according to the code, XaAES de activates thrid party FS, so at
least allowing for Selectric would allow for certain other FS by
default.

I would still look at the unblocking too, as MyAES does. But there is
also quite a bit of work needed on enhancing the FS itself

So again, its not about any one solution, obviously some work is more
extensive that others, but ultimately, all is needed, to bring up the
compatibility

BTW some similar steps need to be taken with AES calls and AES
objects, but that is for another thread

Paul