From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Feb 2 13:23:40 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=yDTJ1JmXaZxiBhtMmvdPyLDsR7EkMPRfi4iuQQyGQ8E=; b=wUpdShVQWouVY9fmy/IsBfKf4j64102dSDOe8JDrjQQmCZG/R10Go9rstj0dGbTcEg OxklItoJt/kkHbjf02HvOetv6l9Ihg1bPswFPaQ6YCmloqKLMZKCoUaQnYHIAeXkYT3E gC1bzJMBeOFhzBF3UxMlBazRBXs+15LII4c8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=K4QFgBIX4le9ZCFZxINjgKB0njzudaqUtKmgx4gDY7Mtm8qaUlI7e/bBsSFGvNZQVZ EfMbJgfYt+Doy3i+5FYbImvItT5ug4xpxtr3hKNvly3meNZaAUexiRe5KRFfXv95VXq5 /zfIGhOS581VtHjV79MHa0TP8dcL2BFoXvl2M= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: <4B686BD9.2030501@online.no> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:19:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1AC91B13-160B-4E57-AE95-3AED992E8951@gmail.com> References: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com> <4B686BD9.2030501@online.no> To: mint Mailing-List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o12INeu7015968 2 feb 2010 kl. 19.15 skrev Jo Even Skarstein: > I agree. While the overlay/module-system may work perfectly fine, it's > still a patch/hack. Even worse, if such a system is becoming popular > then it may restrict kernel development to maintain compatibility with > this "hack". My feelings exactly. Now I've given some more thought to this, and decided that I'll touch LDG the day it becomes part of the OS. Prior to that, I'd rather stick to SLB - even if it's considered to be dead. -- PeP