From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Feb 2 10:29:25 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=T8cW7YEUP0nuqqYGH7bBk1FxvxaSs0NRx3aDVQi4HMs=; b=Z1tIm30KrwF/9fumLJaMIc4634wlk9+xe9/Hynyzay8xYJU3dVaFrdJQpTkgF2x2No KS19CsbE6O1+lMv+tC774Xw+3+HrQQbAvrlwyrZ/zyoUy+eKG6sE7DBKmnq7Gw19Mx+F 8X4LdZY+am42eBpZgYSH4q1RcQZTYmyYJ0M0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=aaOYPagCaPL8JRZW2dwz51w6uWaJn8yq7GxkIYC2FcemuE3/7bUP4AdOhVF0CjVRT+ /Kulz7UoglDtuEhdW1P+A1i047lIthTJzQrV55UvhSooivNIEyfhZLBa7uK7QK9NiVhO 8i9JTDti+DpLBs9oXdqWTrXKgrHaDbR9JQAVc= Subject: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--945710327 From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:24:58 +0100 Cc: mint Mailing-List Message-Id: <89794F7E-6236-4A5C-AE99-489121133C46@gmail.com> References: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com>

To: Miro Kropacek X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: --Apple-Mail-8--945710327 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 2 feb 2010 kl. 16.22 skrev Miro Kropacek: > I think Didier use SLB in Aniplayer, actually. But why dead? What's = bad with it? > OK and when you have seen last Aniplayer release? :) I didn't say it's = bad, it's just even more rarely used than LDG, nothing else.=20 > =20 > What bothers me is that in order for this stuff to be really useful, = it should somehow be part of the core OS distribution. Otherwise it's = just another system patch, or hack, needed by some rare applications. > Well, both solutions serve this purpose: for LDG you don't need = necessarily kernel (ldg.prg) and SLB is already part of = FreeMiNT/MagiC/TOS+BetaDOS >=20 > Personally I'd like to turn some of my code into shared libraries, to = avoid having to recompile and republish lots of stuff just because I = fixed one of (many) bugs in personal libraries. > I guess an "official" line is too much to beg for here, because it's a = matter of personal preference? > I understand... you can view it from the angle you're free to choose = from two equally good options ;-) Ok, fine :) Well I felt that I needed some input on this, to avoid = betting on the wrong horse so to speak. Thanks! -- PeP= --Apple-Mail-8--945710327 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

2 feb 2010 kl. 16.22 skrev Miro Kropacek:

I think Didier use SLB in Aniplayer, actually. But why dead? What's bad with it?
OK and when you have seen last Aniplayer release? :) I didn't say it's bad, it's just even more rarely used than LDG, nothing else.

What bothers me is that in order for this stuff to be really useful, it should somehow be part of the core OS distribution. Otherwise it's just another system patch, or hack, needed by some rare applications.

Well, both solutions serve this purpose: for LDG you don't need necessarily kernel (ldg.prg) and SLB is already part of FreeMiNT/MagiC/TOS+BetaDOS

Personally I'd like to turn some of my code into shared libraries, to avoid having to recompile and republish lots of stuff just because I fixed one of (many) bugs in personal libraries.

I guess an "official" line is too much to beg for here, because it's a matter of personal preference?
I understand... you can view it from the angle you're free to choose from two equally good options ;-)

Ok, fine :) Well I felt that I needed some input on this, to avoid betting on the wrong horse so to speak. Thanks!

-- PeP

--Apple-Mail-8--945710327--