From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Feb  2 10:08:44 2010
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=PGlcfyLBYtbkVe6TTn7GLplF5/8d6Rt3VF87UDzmUeI=;
        b=Yet/qay7a5LZJpyzZk2egPek/0pAOdPs6uGsD+mnLJHK+TaSGuddt/m46jP6Y9BR1c
         9/6XKXDiyiiJIJZR6TaGm/CfmhhKBAvvOecenExWzJNdgu/Bi2DCwhZ382S7i8TkfuZl
         BwP1n8302sfoXl57p9hZCL219zw7HbY9LHGbs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=v55DREEA683kiFDwU6y/mvEg0rpZO9hAaNs/r96XKWeiXS2r+rGHtUOlJbPWAelmaq
         0kTyRHVjSlYTXC2B8cucKnU43K2aPl825HebSh6PG5+AosfVJyGbfo/ofQyz/z0kFMWw
         0/7cy+3J55k9Sx+/cvWR1zKcqXMH07l6Ls35I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com>
References: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:05:44 +0100
Message-ID: <c6533ef61002020705h7e2c02ccke004dffd384887bd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
To: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>
Cc: mint Mailing-List <mint@fishpool.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a306a4e1a6047e9f6f1c
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

--00032555a306a4e1a6047e9f6f1c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> So, are people using LDGs in favour of SLB? If this is the case, would it
> be beneficial to have support for this in the OS?
>
It's hard do say -- LDG seems to be preferred in France only ;), SLB is on
the other hand really dead (last thing I saw as SLB was Draco's experimental
GEMMA library). Personally, I'd go LDG way, if nothing else, you've got
authors / developers here, in ML.


And the LDG + memory protection issue - why is this?
>
I think this isn't issue anymore (fixed by my last patch), at least in
non-kernel mode (without ldg.prg) but I wouldn't be surprised if this works
well, too.

-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

--00032555a306a4e1a6047e9f6f1c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">So=
, are people using LDGs in favour of SLB? If this is the case, would it be =
beneficial to have support for this in the OS?<br>
</blockquote><div>It&#39;s hard do say -- LDG seems to be preferred in Fran=
ce only ;), SLB is on the other hand really dead (last thing I saw as SLB w=
as Draco&#39;s experimental GEMMA library). Personally, I&#39;d go LDG way,=
 if nothing else, you&#39;ve got authors / developers here, in ML.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"ma=
rgin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
And the LDG + memory protection issue - why is this?<br></blockquote><div>I=
 think this isn&#39;t issue anymore (fixed by my last patch), at least in n=
on-kernel mode (without ldg.prg) but I wouldn&#39;t be surprised if this wo=
rks well, too.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>MiKRO / Mystic Bytes<br><a href=3D"http://mikro=
.atari.org">http://mikro.atari.org</a><br>

--00032555a306a4e1a6047e9f6f1c--