From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sat Feb  6 11:18:56 2010
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=Lu8VT3lK2Ch+i41oo06eNtb0VniHhP3qXNldi0ojNJA=;
        b=s9NZHQpV3MN+QEw4uGDvnEvd8tJNUElzLkq/GSkImLToznIybIbfVePFj7GMjNt1zS
         Lz1Sewx/a9/v/9Prz6yQk7iAt5qsG9ZvnldeLbj0RqsmC7O/RqSRQ5bebxEJ+uiXdwWg
         RMHfyaqK9Mp4ObAvneKCOV0LfUkbBxqShXl9g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=s8fca9vz51ZoEq/dg3mNWM3ora9NDF4XXfvIM6aNaQGvtZFCvy85+56mF5tNtgbbRn
         JiCBH/ZKUQ1+mZRp92sEX8lXJlGCcPX/23ls2xsxd21oKSaNtG4IfyUyzj1WFuvRL20m
         XMZrn3R75rri6/LeqTFcohV3oNg85R94GQEAw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:14:52 +0100
Message-ID: <c6533ef61002060814oc7563c2t1b8a7421ee95b07c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [MiNT] What freemint branches are suitable for testing?
From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
To: MiNT Mailing List <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255592ba4f38d6047ef0de83
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

--0003255592ba4f38d6047ef0de83
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

subject says it. There's now freemint (trunk), freemint-enhancements (alan),
ozk-enhancements (ozk) and helmut-enhancements (helmut) "versions". Which
one should I use / report bugs for? I mean, I want to avoid situation I
report bug in XXX branch and the reply will be "you shouldn't use this, it's
still highly experimental" and vice versa (for example if the main
development now happens in freemint-enhancements). I'm little bit confused,
please help :)

-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

--0003255592ba4f38d6047ef0de83
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<br><br>subject says it. There&#39;s now freemint (trunk), freemint-enha=
ncements (alan), ozk-enhancements (ozk) and helmut-enhancements (helmut) &q=
uot;versions&quot;. Which one should I use / report bugs for? I mean, I wan=
t to avoid situation I report bug in XXX branch and the reply will be &quot=
;you shouldn&#39;t use this, it&#39;s still highly experimental&quot; and v=
ice versa (for example if the main development now happens in freemint-enha=
ncements). I&#39;m little bit confused, please help :)<br clear=3D"all">
<br>-- <br>MiKRO / Mystic Bytes<br><a href=3D"http://mikro.atari.org">http:=
//mikro.atari.org</a><br>

--0003255592ba4f38d6047ef0de83--