From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Feb 22 18:36:15 2010 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de From: Andreas Schwab To: Jo Even Skarstein Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Bug with files. References: <241921.75443.qm@web27403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4B82F179.1030801@online.no> <4B830018.7010804@online.no> X-Yow: I feel real SOPHISTICATED being in FRANCE! Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:33:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4B830018.7010804@online.no> (Jo Even Skarstein's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:07:20 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: schwab@linux-m68k.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Jo Even Skarstein writes: > Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Jo Even Skarstein writes: >> >>> I would assume that the creation date should be left untouched? >> >> There's no such thing as a creation time in Unix. There's only the >> inode change time. > > Fxattr returns two different timestamps for the creation time and There is no such thing as a creation time. > modification time on my Milan, as long as the file(s) hasn't been > changed recently. The inode change time changes whenever the inode changes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."