From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Mar 2 06:23:05 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:x-priority:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=W8a0pjS632RNqdBjfolrtxSbseOr1oj5Z5RgrWifIEg=; b=Pq0pGU6eIUujSJZ5wd35XCg+g6ET9s5N1rfjVIOoy4YX5kAZgJpSP07B0mPvLkla68 ZSUKTF6KT4so7hP2fvDf1kKTU2/YaRYYWiTtEy0uDLbk4zp3CRg5SIiOc3BVlD4ajq6W 819JagYOVqhnjAbraZrm6t3iL6dXjS7e5JqkI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:x-priority:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=P8j1Ft5jOo2p/6I2x2W5gMKkM888rGZN3ea7QS/cI4dwuuNHFfTtBb2c7XSpEYBGXG N8f4NCaQICop3C8Qm3BJ+9hLVbqE8wMKX1pHwosWLeLHb8KEtKaUlKtzRWE8Ut1gNJgK c9RCKKf+tvfs3TElNuVsWb/IXEKCCbrqPINlY= Subject: Re: [MiNT] Patch for xaloader.prg Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <705F63F48C2C4A5DB20EAA44BDE963C3@mercatus.local> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:21:28 +0100 Cc: "mint_list" Message-Id: <1FCDF6DD-3317-4246-8BF9-36A32423A175@gmail.com> References: <72454075-6FA5-46CA-A174-A3AE573771A6@gmail.com> <20100301222525.bcb94ec5.mandin.patrice@orange.fr> <04F5AE6B-D53F-4EE1-BA57-9BA46392BD13@gmail.com> <1B8C9039-CFB4-4675-9E79-5D1CC4F54DAC@gmail.com> <705F63F48C2C4A5DB20EAA44BDE963C3@mercatus.local> To: Jo Even Skarstein X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o22BN0Eq026530 On 2 mar 2010, at 08.53, Jo Even Skarstein wrote: > It's a good idea, but to simplify the code a bit you can remove the support for Aranym, Milan and 68000. These systems can only work with one kernel, so having more kernels available does not make sense. I disagree, because that means the same installation cannot be used on multiple machines? -- PeP