From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Apr 27 04:57:49 2010 Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:54:46 +0300 From: George Nakos X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1156646117.20100427115446@hol.gr> To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Messages received twice In-Reply-To: <2020469515.5212171272356526984.JavaMail.root@spooler6-g27.priv.proxad.net> References: <2020469515.5212171272356526984.JavaMail.root@spooler6-g27.priv.proxad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/10739/Wed Apr 14 06:54:30 2010 on takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ggn@hol.gr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o3R8vmY5027842 Hello xavier, Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 11:22:07 AM, you wrote: > Hi, > ----- "Miro Kropacek" a écrit : >> Do you have someone an idea why it's so great to have To: ? >> To my naive look there are only disadvantages. > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html > Long story made short: the current setup is the right one. It is > your MUA responsability to provide features to handle it right. After reading only a fraction of the text in that link, I can only conclude that the people involved into writing this were definitely were into "that particular time of the month" :P Personally I don't mind getting messages twice. I just ignore the second copy. And now I just take the extra few seconds to change the to/bcc to point to the mintlist only. Much easier than switching e-mail clients or trying to convince the authors about this problem and fix it (because then I wouldn't be much different from the whiny people from the above link - life's too short to worry about insignificant stuff!) -- Best regards, George mailto:ggn@hol.gr