From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Apr 8 14:20:52 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4hIbRGFG9wmbvrVDMfa8HgBQ0pARjSrNnHdLniOut7w=; b=bgo1IpoHwYkYzHo63/McGR9dr8FVCnc+0ie3h09Gy9w1uAi0tsV0/HvSUqJoE4wVLw G9Q5Z4YP6Jn/Pzv9VsHX5Va+y2pBtIYyO5pOR/LFpvUWa4yZ21W79kmcGV3PE3OZFhCP m6z0jGBFb+eJjPbHXdJAd+2GucSCs+pTxP7zA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Yp3DpixGzm2tt+HpMoxFi1FMsgjTwVtxD1hmKx0T0kxkEXfj0q+ywPBVMVdH1lmacP Tv3aEIcTpeJb4mJQMeAJC2miXMDa/fyUy2hXT9WVmqGn+DW5cLlZ6aWmhQjW9edZj6cE UsAiydi7SGw6dFk2g2rrzGCDKsob+GZ3RAsI4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BBE134B.9010400@freesbee.fr> References: <1270663938.19190.1368.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <4BBDFF6B.8090401@freesbee.fr> <4BBE134B.9010400@freesbee.fr> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:18:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC upstream ?? From: Miro Kropacek To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758aa6c4182320483bdb5ff X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: miro.kropacek@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: --00151758aa6c4182320483bdb5ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > If there is no objection from the MiNT community, I'm going to continue > that way. This means that the future unpatched binutils sources will > integrate full MiNT support, with the exact same features as in my latest > patch. > Cool! Many thanks for taking care about this, no more patches for us. > > If this is going to succeed (more likely), the next task will be to > integrate the GCC patches. A totally different story. > Just out of interest, what problems you're facing here? I assumed your GCC patches are clean and nice, i.e. same as with binutils. -- MiKRO / Mystic Bytes http://mikro.atari.org --00151758aa6c4182320483bdb5ff Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If there is no o= bjection from the MiNT community, I'm going to continue that way. This = means that the future unpatched binutils sources will integrate full MiNT s= upport, with the exact same features as in my latest patch.
Cool! Many thanks for taking care about this, no more pat= ches for us.

If this is going to succeed (more likely), the next task will be to integra= te the GCC patches. A totally different story.
Just ou= t of interest, what problems you're facing here? I assumed your GCC pat= ches are clean and nice, i.e. same as with binutils.

--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org
--00151758aa6c4182320483bdb5ff--