From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri May 21 12:45:09 2010 Message-ID: <4BF6B83F.8000907@highlandsun.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 09:43:43 -0700 From: Howard Chu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100413 Firefox 3.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Scroggins CC: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] OpenSSL 1.0.0 for 68000 / 68020-60 / Colfire 5475 References: <4BF6612E.1000409@highlandsun.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: hyc@highlandsun.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Keith Scroggins wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2010, Howard Chu wrote: > >> Nice work. Did you do any M68K-specific assembly optimizations? I note the >> OpenSSL 1.0 source code still doesn't use the asm code I submitted. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg10768.html > > Hello Howard, > > Nope, it is all straight C code. How much of a difference does your patch > make? I can try testing it to see if it drops right in for the 68020-60 > target. It was at least a 4X speedup on 68030. Given how old the code is, it may not just drop in to 1.0, but it's worth looking at at least. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/