From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat May 29 03:02:37 2010 Message-ID: <4C00BB9D.2020206@abbuc.de> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:00:45 +0200 From: Stefan Niestegge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] This must be an gcc / ld error! References: <4BFFFC90.50904@freesbee.fr> <00275294.0195ce9e13b0@smtp.freeola.net> <4C0034F9.7060606@online.no> <5fe1bd15a8d7a7a97c94eb06e6062d97-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXlloAFNVMl5dRkACV1xfQVw=-webmailer2@server07.webmailer.hosteurope.de> In-Reply-To: <5fe1bd15a8d7a7a97c94eb06e6062d97-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXlloAFNVMl5dRkACV1xfQVw=-webmailer2@server07.webmailer.hosteurope.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: beetle@abbuc.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Am 29.05.2010 00:43, schrieb Ole Loots: > Am Fr, 28.05.2010, 23:26 schrieb Jo Even Skarstein: > > >> I just tested NetSurf on Ubuntu btw, and I'm afraid I was quite >> disappointed :( There are a lot of rendering errors. Quite a bit better >> than Links, but not good enough to be of real use. Even sites like >> atari-forum.com isn't rendered correctly. >> >> Jo Even >> > Hello, > > what do you mean by saying "There are a lot of rendering errors" ? I > tested it with Ubuntu ( not the SDL port, but GTK2) and it looked very > well. Maybe there were some small errors ( looked like some elements > needed some more spacing...), but the pages looked very well. > > Currently I can't try atari-forum.com because installing the netsurf svn > framebuffer version changed some dependencies.... but forum.atari-home.de > looked well ( and some other pages, too). > > What do you mean by saying "quite a bit better than links" - Links has no > images, links is a text browser, ...., thats a big difference :) > > After all I don't target the SDL-framebuffer version, If possible, I would > like to see an GEM port... But I think that doesn't matter for pure > rendering issues... > > Ole, Jo and other talk about the Links port that Didier made and has on his site, and that one is a graphical browser with images. Give it a go! Greetings, Stefan