From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun May 30 04:13:45 2010 Message-ID: <4C021D02.3090403@online.no> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 10:08:34 +0200 From: Jo Even Skarstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib / Kernel Future and also SpareMiNT..... References: <4C01C304.8030606@atari-source.org> <201005301048.54254.oak@helsinkinet.fi> In-Reply-To: <201005301048.54254.oak@helsinkinet.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On 05/30/2010 09:48 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote: > There could be two pages. One "wishes for kernel" that is open for everyone > and another one a roadmap which is closed for editing (could come e.g. from > version control). The roadmap belongs in the bugtracker. So does the feature list. If these systems are kept separate, it's much more work to move features from the wish-list to the roadmap and then into the bugtracker. A bugtracker tool ('bugtracker' is really not a good name, as it's used to manage features as well) makes life a lot easier if you have a long term plan with the project. Jo Even