From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu May 27 15:46:58 2010 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:45:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Keith Scroggins To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib / Kernel Future and also SpareMiNT..... In-Reply-To: <1274987559.11662.17.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <4BFEBEFB.9000304@atari-source.org> <1274987559.11662.17.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: kws@radix.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Hourihane wrote: > Yes, 0.59 was officially tagged but never actually uploaded. If someone > wants to create an RPM from the tag that'd be great. I'd go with 0.59.1 like Mark mentioned, so we get anything newer that has gone in, like the STACKSIZE variable, which I believe is newer. > I'm pursuing Gentoo because I absolutely hate RPMs. I use Gentoo on all > my other platforms too. So for me, it's a natural choice. But certainly > feel free to pick patches etc, but I send all my stuff upstream so the > packages build out-of-the-box. So we'll all benefit regardless, but it's > merely a matter of personal choice for folks. I can definitely say I agree with you on RPMs at some points. >> PS: I vote for Alan as a new kernel leader. He's already been >> performing this role anyway. > > I'm quite happy to do this and will certainly be making a release soon > of the kernel with our thanks to Frank. Sweet, thank you! Keith