From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri May 28 13:44:02 2010 Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:42:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Keith Scroggins To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] MPFR and MPC in the Queue for SpareMiNT.... In-Reply-To: <4BFFFE77.8020805@freesbee.fr> Message-ID: References: <4BFFFE77.8020805@freesbee.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-559023410-630072926-1275068531=:15110" X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: kws@radix.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---559023410-630072926-1275068531=:15110 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Fri, 28 May 2010, Vincent Rivi=E8re wrote: > Keith Scroggins wrote: >> - tset_ld seems to just hang, it ran for 4 hours without returning resul= ts. >> - tcmp_ld returns ERROR for NAN (1) > > These are worrying, we should try to understand what is happening. I'm thinking I'm going to let the tset_ld test run overnight, around 8 to= =20 10 hours at least, and see if it really hangs, or finally passes. It does= =20 pass, I believe, when the build is targeted for 68020-60. >> MPC 0.8.2 is the latest version, as of my last check. > > The only remaining after MPFR, isn't it ? Yes, its the last one needed for GCC 4.5.0 Keith ---559023410-630072926-1275068531=:15110--