From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jun 1 14:18:49 2010 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk Subject: Re: [MiNT] SpareMiNT MiNTLib / MiNTBin Conflicts and Outdated PML / Fdlibm From: Alan Hourihane To: Keith Scroggins Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:16:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1275416165.10694.5.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 12:56 -0400, Keith Scroggins wrote: > Hi List, > > So, I have been working on building 0.59.1 RPMs for SpareMiNT. I actually > have an RPM set built.... > > So far, have run into 2 issues. > > The first is that both the mintbin package, and the newer mintlib have > ar.h. My resolution is just rebuild and remove from mintbin, and then fix > the spec for mintlib to want the newer revision. Yes, mintbin has had this removed. > The other issue is that math.h is now removed. Both PML and Fdlibm, as > packaged in SpareMiNT, do not contain their own math.h. My solution for > this is to just rebuild the packages, PML with Vicent's patches adding > Coldfire support, and take a look at the Fdlibm in CVS. Alan, have > you done more Fdlibm work? I saw that at least a math.h is present in > CVS. Right. We'd need to do a release of fdlibm which has math.h. Alternatively we merge a math library into mintlib. Patrice mentioned one in an earlier thread. > This is an issue because on install of mintlib-devel, rpm will delete the > math.h file as it was the previous package owner of it, and it is now not > present. > > Otherwise, the only changes made to MiNTLib (and I'll submit a patch) is > enabling Coldfire libraries, upping the version, and rpm changelog. I'm > thinking about fixing the spec to require the newer mintbin as well, but > not sure yet. > > Any thoughts? Send patches and we can all discuss. Thanks, Alan.