From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Jun 23 05:35:50 2010
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [MiNT] UNIXMODE defaults
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
To: Vincent =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rivi=E8re?= <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Cc: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
In-Reply-To: <4C21D188.5000208@freesbee.fr>
References: <1277280022.11001.3.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <4C21CC12.3050401@freesbee.fr>
	 <1277283908.11001.12.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
	 <4C21D188.5000208@freesbee.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:33:08 +0100
Message-ID: <1277285588.11001.13.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o5N9ZnEZ032018

On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 11:19 +0200, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > The kernel sets the default UNIXMODE to "/brUs", so by default the
> > kernel is setting up the environment. So the user actually has to ask
> > for it to behave like TOS. So it's the other way around to your liking.
> 
> Well, if some day the official behaviour does not match my needs, I will 
> patch the kernel and use an unofficial version.

Well, it's been like this for at least 10 years :-)

> > I think I'm going to enforce scriptability now too, which I don't think
> > is any significant problem given that I think most people would want the
> > script that starts with #! to be interpreted as a shell script.
> 
> What could be the problems ?

I can't think of any.

Alan.


