From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sat Jun 19 06:31:06 2010
X-ME-UUID: 20100619102903604.9381B7000078@mwinf2b07.orange.fr
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:29:03 +0200
From: Patrice Mandin <mandin.patrice@orange.fr>
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Still don't get it - difference between 68020 and
 68020-60
Message-Id: <20100619122903.672ba2e2.mandin.patrice@orange.fr>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006181724120.2220@saltmine.radix.net>
References: <729ec3d897ff67cb50ea2269d3c5d33c-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXldoA1VcMl5dRkMKX1hZQFA=-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
	<AANLkTilYGU_w-mINXvhpuz4CFcgrFHaueGtLLdBosLmB@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.63.1006181724120.2220@saltmine.radix.net>
Organization: Chez moi
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: mandin.patrice@orange.fr
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o5JAV5ft011376

Le Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:27:46 -0400 (EDT)
Keith Scroggins <kws@radix.net> a écrit:

> -m68020 with use the -m68020-60 option.
> 
> So, you either build:
> 
> 68000 code
> Code compatible with 68020-60 with FPU
> Code compatible with v4e Coldfire CPUs
> 
> No other targets are supported.
> 
> To support straight -m68020, someone would need to specifically build libc 
> and friends supporting it, and maintain it, besides adding support to GCC.

That's why I keep a gcc patch around to be able to build 68020 code
without FPU, mainly to target standard Falcon without FPU.

I understand why Vincent would not put it in his gcc patch, as it would
mean 8 multilib configurations (68000,68020,68020-60,m5475, each
with/without mshort) when building gcc. This is not a problem for me,
as I build cross-compilers; it's done fast on my PC, and I have
plenty of hard disk space.

-- 
Patrice Mandin
WWW: http://pmandin.atari.org/
Programmeur Linux, Atari
Spécialité: Développement, jeux

"who writes the code, decides"