From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Jun  1 04:28:24 2010
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=2Hd87eBxHKkDctXLS7unK6K56DgXywFOyKJksd/7sHg=;
        b=OklNL0T+cAoVhJSCOGacO1izD6C8qMyf0O1y1ay0LWyS/G2uB/qeRg4PdPNdfREZTS
         jJn8Nrj/bLdM6Imn3quPh0xMIfaTvN3cTvikUGpwMfkn1kpb0dGn7ZLy+GozZ4xEDB+T
         0oluJ3TVYwOXFx8el0sWyHxyf2KC5dc59Cg0M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=R6noEU5CikYi7WDjjWfwU9AMzZij4YiJWaiDmB0IYbgd3xzoQE8wUN3X7XO+27B1qM
         l44VL6nm8XOLyHXZwz6ZxNukisdnZDgNpvgZv93kIHPOtYgGiFfkd1hvCehj22pH4YBM
         tAruID46DsuLfO+SOMLbBTEzBzueW7wnwYQ7M=
Message-ID: <4C04C427.5010301@freesbee.fr>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:26:15 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Multi-Target SpareMiNT (RPM) Thoughts - How to do it maybe
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1005271639210.17891@saltmine.radix.net>	<4BFEDC2C.8050008@online.no>	<4BFFCBCB.6070705@atari-source.org> <AANLkTin0wdthc2PKuXNVL-YCijKXNotzHlOWcQycSo4-@mail.gmail.com> <4C0430D5.3020002@online.no> <4C04B2DD.7040309@abbuc.de> <619FE7182C2C419A9D5C2BFAB717A6B8@mercatus.local>
In-Reply-To: <619FE7182C2C419A9D5C2BFAB717A6B8@mercatus.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
>> Also, some 68k binarys perform better than the 68040 ones.
>> fVDI for example, the 68k one gives a score (Kronos, VDI test) of 155% 
>> on my system, and if i use the fvdi_040.prg instead, score goes down 
>> to 122% (Reference system: Powermac 8600 ).
> 
> Then there must be something seriously wrong with the compiler...

I would be interested to see the results with a GCC 4.x compiled fVDI.
However, since these low-level software usually contain assembler 
sources, the compiler CPU settings are not fully relevant. Of course, we 
should never see inverted results like those reported here.

-- 
Vincent Rivière