From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Thu Jun 10 04:41:49 2010
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ZMwURLt/gj0rhOqd8N4dtJ6gCd55BQaTjhJ8ivXVReo=;
        b=ryWHq92ObJpjo1gZf3j8e7bCKS9Tiw1AUk+Fw7kDa/AJ76H4Ra9ZemFp1G2zqkP4e2
         puro9s5/xcyLy4MCo2HJDvEQMiT9NwfkjUtRKGzMDcGEMnKYvUwuz9IKOz8NZh26FGfc
         JI4SYPNUO6GDmFlnAlxCEaGa8Fh7SUp77KYIo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=V8fcJDUcocwlHo5FjgCyjZ7jLfZROYOmMGXNH2NXNCouxrCRBpL2iXzwzHjGCUUUxw
         CDb8lYQb4DCDw87+gJqpDhEHBiHgq9hzji8xBngb2b1DuNVT7awsEp8j2vLLzhsKdNbE
         neqyB4aIUXV7Vwn9KZIeWjImdLDLWUCRZW4B8=
Message-ID: <4C10A1DA.2070103@freesbee.fr>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:27:06 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vincent_Rivi=E8re?= <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Mixing binary code for different machine... is it ok?
References: <3a29599fd3dd0088076b2e1bd2c7b4d9-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYBV0F0CDpUX1hZQEcDX1Ne-webmailer2@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>	<4C1013E2.3090505@freesbee.fr>	<e1000760c2c9aba99c69143bea40af65-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYBV0F0CDpUX1hZQEcAWVJd-webmailer2@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de>	<4C1017E8.7050707@freesbee.fr>	<170beb6df97e2447489a8cc1584b5d3b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYBV0F0CDpUX1hZQEcGX1Nc-webmailer2@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de> <AANLkTikPiMOiqVFtFo80bz2FB4AgaE9zWraCTKiHRCvd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikPiMOiqVFtFo80bz2FB4AgaE9zWraCTKiHRCvd@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

Miro Kropacek wrote:
> Isn't simpler to use default m68k build for netsurf and tweak 020+
> support as the last thing?

Yes, this is the thing to do.
Build a working 68000 binary, then compile it for advanced processors 
after fixing additional compilation issues.

-- 
Vincent Rivière