From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Jun 14 22:31:12 2010 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=wbKXeunVgZ0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=z-3pvwOIAAAA:8 a=5OaTPgZGAAAA:8 a=f_Z4n2cN6MlSToqS6a4A:9 a=UktCp8PGyK-NCxbIFtEA:7 a=WsNzTI14-CXQ-8OCSXTHL1_r-yUA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Message-ID: <4C16E556.1030208@charter.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:28:38 -0400 From: Rob Mahlert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] New RPM libezxml References: <09a2f4b3b7d3a704493cc2e4e12ab099-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJX15oA1dTMl5dRkMHWl5eRFg=-webmailer2@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: rmahlert@charter.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On 6/14/2010 8:47 PM, Keith Scroggins wrote: > Hello Ole, > > In the past Frank would review all RPMs, so I guess that job is kind > of open. I did rebuild the RPM on my system without issue. The only > item I noticed quickly was that make does not use the defined CFLAGS. > > I'll look into it a little more tomorrow, hopefully. It builds fine > on my Falcon at least! :) > > Thanks for your work, also! > > Keith > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, m0n0 wrote: > >> >> Hello there, >> >> I providing a new RPM for FreeMiNT, I don't know if there is an testing >> process here, but If nobody likes to test the package, I would simply >> upload them to the sparemint webpage. >> >> I tested the installation with the test program provided in the src >> package, and it seems to be OK. >> >> http://freeshell.de/~monokrom/monochrom.net/atari/ports/ezxml-0.8.6-1.m68kmint.rpm >> >> http://freeshell.de/~monokrom/monochrom.net/atari/ports/ezxml-0.8.6-1.src.rpm >> >> >> Greets, >> Ole Like Keith said.. Frank use to review all submissions. A few here I trust enough, I just add their packages. But we really need to setup some system to test packages. Any suggestions???? I know the old packages are archived, so if something is not good, I can always place the old package back. Ole.. If a few other test the package and say it's ok here on the list.. upload it to the incoming. But more importantly.. thanks for building packages! Rob