From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jun 18 17:42:04 2010 Message-ID: <4C1BE78C.5020609@lutece.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:39:24 +0200 From: OL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Still don't get it - difference between 68020 and 68020-60 References: <729ec3d897ff67cb50ea2269d3c5d33c-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXldoA1VcMl5dRkMKX1hZQFA=-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de> <4C1BE3F5.4090109@lutece.net> <4C1BE49E.6040609@freesbee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4C1BE49E.6040609@freesbee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: o.l@lutece.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o5ILg3OY013799 Vincent Rivière a écrit : > Le 18/06/2010 23:24, OL a écrit : >> -m68020 doesn't use FPU it's for 68020 only > > This was true on GCC 2.x, but not on GCC 4.x. > Oh yes?! Could it be link that compiler was not configure with "--nfp" option? if yes I think it was already the same with gcc 2.95.x. So in this case the -m68020 option should output 68881 FPU instructions. Olivier