From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jun 1 04:04:48 2010 Message-ID: <619FE7182C2C419A9D5C2BFAB717A6B8@mercatus.local> From: "Jo Even Skarstein" To: References: <4BFEDC2C.8050008@online.no> <4BFFCBCB.6070705@atari-source.org> <4C0430D5.3020002@online.no> <4C04B2DD.7040309@abbuc.de> In-Reply-To: <4C04B2DD.7040309@abbuc.de> Subject: Re: [MiNT] Multi-Target SpareMiNT (RPM) Thoughts - How to do it maybe Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:05:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Niestegge" Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:12 AM To: Subject: Re: [MiNT] Multi-Target SpareMiNT (RPM) Thoughts - How to do it maybe > Also, some 68k binarys perform better than the 68040 ones. > fVDI for example, the 68k one gives a score (Kronos, VDI test) of 155% on > my system, and if i use the fvdi_040.prg instead, score goes down to 122% > (Reference system: Powermac 8600 ). Then there must be something seriously wrong with the compiler... Jo Even