From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Fri Jun 11 04:25:21 2010
To: Henk Robbers <h.robbers@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Hoard alternative malloc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:22:25 +0200
From: m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net>
Cc: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Reply-To: ole@monochrom.net
In-Reply-To: <4C116D43.2070706@chello.nl>
References: <931be88a5d0014c7d0d20d18923dd545-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYAWUF3CFQ6XF1YR0QEW1JaRw==-webmailer2@server08.webmailer.hosteurope.de> <4C116D43.2070706@chello.nl>
Message-ID: <8145c67e981dbfa64d0210d43f8836f4-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYBWUF0BTpUX1hZQ0EGWl5c-webmailer2@server01.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
X-Sender: ole@monochrom.net
User-Agent: Host Europe Webmailer/2.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-HE-Access: Yes
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ole@monochrom.net;1276244548;34cd02e6;
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: ole@monochrom.net
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>


Am Freitag, den 11.06.2010, 00:54 +0200 schrieb Henk Robbers
<h.robbers@chello.nl>:
> If you had not used copy/paste but in stead had written
> 1 funcion with 2 parameters (count, chunk) you wouldnt
> have made mistakes and it wouldnt have taken me precious
> time asking myself where the hell are the differences.

Ok, sorry for 1 error in 1 test. ;) But that doesn't mean that hoard isn't
much faster... as you can see by the tests ( the ones that really did
malloc the size that they should malloc...) 

greets,
Ole