From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Jul 17 05:27:52 2010 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:25:39 +0300 From: George Nakos X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1012609582.20100717122539@hol.gr> To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio 0.7r In-Reply-To: <4C4169D4.3060602@online.no> References: <4C224E8E.9020709@atari-source.org> <9AEA137498384954A13681B878432C8F@mercatus.local> <4C378B88.3050801@online.no> <201007121647.28881.oak@helsinkinet.fi> <4C3B5A8E.90908@online.no> <0AF79452-3817-4F3F-BAC7-FA70D89E1A46@gmail.com> <4C4169D4.3060602@online.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on takeit01.mail.dc.hol.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ggn@hol.gr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o6H9Rpgh005961 Hello Jo, Saturday, July 17, 2010, 11:29:08 AM, you wrote: > Regarding speed: It's faster than TosWin2, but not by much. I guess the > difference would be more noticable on a machine with a slower CPU and no > graphics card. On my CT63 Conholio is light years ahead of toswin in terms of speed, especially when outputting a big chunk of characters and scrolling it. -- Best regards, George mailto:ggn@hol.gr