From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Jul 19 20:17:30 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=i08HDJXJ6EtJ+hELMYjlx92gXglBQJ550gn/4RULGqk=; b=oMR6Hg3QodW2a43qcRrGtPscLM6HGFGlDEkrQcA/sTPW5tvUDazCsLGmQOf04hlSog DDTSK7756T5Wfsv8X6TOg8SWQhTCvAKh4fxNcesbL1zakc/PMe/0SS1qdVzTNQvJVexS 8Pu992xwkUAoBUBhDd1zV7MVg3tShXR0YrhQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=l+WFmKh3MsC/Ih2vTR9TTEv2k5tW+lfSyP4eDQBZn+BdS1sm26c0IJW/9Yt8hDspDF 0ff3p5d6rAJtLJ2B/327JQrtVmcx6385rnnDUqhRfpPZK/xnG0ysa+9qSzSHKx83v3EF 6OaqTjpRQWRnSMpdfbaYGXU2b8i4FWN/5/NRo= Subject: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:16:10 +0200 Cc: mint Message-Id: <9878431D-47FC-45E6-BA8F-A5348ED6E045@gmail.com> References: <4C416CA5.2030508@online.no> <4C43434A.1000209@online.no> <201007191244.17724.jflemaire@skynet.be> To: Paul Wratt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o6K0HTSj024323 20 jul 2010 kl. 01.55 skrev Paul Wratt: > this is an example of why its still a good thing to allow compilation of > MagiC compatible binaries ----- snip ---- No offense, but I'm not sure I get your point. Are you trying to convince people to write MagiC-compatible software? A friend on this list signs his posts with "who writes the code, decides". That's how it works. Write code, and you get to decide how that code works. Don't write code, and you generally don't get to decide anything whatsoever. So let's write code, ha? -- PeP