From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Jul 18 13:46:47 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=DTDkpTY1+lfzUe18RCgkzS/oH+nv+7TN7h8bVdGfPHM=; b=bRLv17b2o29mEKrssQ7idFsm49byJNBa25FqSwO7Kwrp+upjNzIKJ1TjBWmvOWjZ3R i8dd0nux0p7DPupou6tC0oSKxrI89ZPCuscG9fx+0Ca2udZuR0qbNdhE578o3YK0dLg+ fvUj1x5y0Q5pvzws4PSJht4MmpkGtFZUAcRjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=RV3ycpp6+j8mwB361TPWuyvQlPtZVMGghG+ij/xGbPLmgm7h4iv+lCRody1zmhCRR6 e1CIj5gX6vqtwi7U41GN7YRHVMGnJ21865/yD77dqK5IYmR+TWFVRIXnPM1aYJYEDBA1 SUOIv+wR5vkLaZuXUqgLy43TZP1ltMYDHCYwQ= Subject: Re: [MiNT] GEM frameworks Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:45:05 +0200 Cc: mint Message-Id: <9BC99A9A-7D26-42E7-AAAC-0DD9247C9295@gmail.com> References: <4C416CA5.2030508@online.no> <201007172108.p55789@wun.maus.de> To: Paul Wratt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o6IHkkbq028569 18 jul 2010 kl. 09.23 skrev Paul Wratt: > I do know of software that has been released in the past 12-18 months > that is TOS/MiNT/MagiC/Geneva compatible in a single binary, therefore > I know it is possible to NOT "safely ignore Geneva" I'd say it's safe to ignore Geneva and MagiC. I've stopped supporting them, they're closed source, no longer developed and dead. I support FreeMiNT & XaAES/MyAES, and I want more people to use them. Unless you write a library which handles the functionality lacking from Geneva & MagiC... then I'd support them, of course. -- PeP