From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jul 20 02:21:41 2010 Message-ID: From: "Jo Even Skarstein" To: "mint" References: <00022d62.01b8d262a99c@smtp.freeola.net><607510502.20100718141435@hol.gr><4C433F9A.8010507@online.no> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio 0.7r Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:20:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: -------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul Wratt" Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:23 AM To: "mint" Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio 0.7r > I believe the use of .PSF for conholio is a good one, and that the > addition of > vdi fonts would be welcomed later on (according to the posts here) IMO it's the other way around. Implement support for VDI/GDOS-fonts and save a lot of work by not having to implement support for any other type of fonts. Jo Even