From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Aug 9 04:55:57 2010 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk Subject: Re: [MiNT] 1.17 Release - Call for documentation updates ! From: Alan Hourihane To: Peter Slegg Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: <00351da9.01f8f262f4a4@smtp.freeola.net> References: <00351da9.01f8f262f4a4@smtp.freeola.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:54:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1281344078.19150.5.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.co.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 17:23 +0200, Peter Slegg wrote: > On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:05:20 , Miro Kropacek wrote: > > > The daily builds have been available for quite some time, that's more > > No, they are not, we see every day how there's missing this or that or > > some random build error occurred etc. I want full package with all > > docs, RSCs, themes etc to be reviewed. Now it's just another update > > with very few testing. Personally, I never downloaded those builds. I > > want to test real release candidate. > > > > > than sufficient for RC. So I'm really going for 1.17 now. > > Do what do you find as most appropriate, it was just a suggestion. > > > > > > > > want to hold up releases calling them RC as we don't have enough people > > > testing anyway. > > There were at least 3 more people who volunteered to put extra work in > > RC testing. How many people test daily builds? > > > I have been running the daily build for several months, maybe 5 by now. > First with the Helmut build but in the last 5-6 weeks the Trunk build. > > It is much more stable than 1.16.3 but there have been bugs like the > shutdown one and the RAM disc one is still there AFAIK. Refresh my memory. What ramdisk problem ? Alan.