From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Aug 25 17:44:06 2010
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:41:48 +0200
From: Piotrek <mietniow@agh.edu.pl>
To: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Cc: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT + XAAES + Teradesk under CT63
Organization: AGH
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinYVMfS93k3We2EiOh1TQe_HfRXq+iBpqOLGPNK@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2865d02f94207a4db668f4c849bb785c@127.0.0.1> <AANLkTinYVMfS93k3We2EiOh1TQe_HfRXq+iBpqOLGPNK@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2eb1ff2c922d925cd52b117da54ca8f2@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: mietniow@agh.edu.pl
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: mietniow@agh.edu.pl
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o7PLi6kQ028048

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:30:54 +0200, Miro Kropacek
<miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> I have question about configuration and speed at Xcontrol. I use this
> How does this behave without mint? If the same, this isn't mint
> related question and you should ask on ct60 bbs @ dhs.nu ...

Without MiNT, under a clean TOS it is Ok about 185 Mips (a clock I set to
95 MHz)

> 
>> system like in topic. I have installed new EASYMint with xaaes and
>> Teradesk. First run system in 2k mode at Xcontrol with CT60Confing in
> I assume "2k" = 2 colors.

Yes

> 
>> bookmark Memory uP show 185 Mips. I use resolution 640x480. When I
change
>> to 256k in the same resolution show only 0.8Mips. Is it normally or
maybe
> You mean again probably 256 colors.
> 
>> Do you know why?
> Honestly, even as CT60 user, no. How does system response? It's really
> 0.8 Mips, i.e. as standard Falcon030? If not, it's bug in CPX.

OK, thanks, now it ok I have only change cache on in General6.cpx and it
is OK, I dont know why

best regards
Piotrek


-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Dr Piotr Mietniowski
Department of Electronics
AGH University of Science and Technology
Av. Mickiewicza 30
30-056 Krakow, Poland
Bldg. C1 r. 212 tel. +48 12 617 30 44
e-mail: mietniow@agh.edu.pl
----------------------------------------------------


