From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sun Aug  8 16:46:28 2010
Message-ID: <4C5F1711.7010102@online.no>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:44:01 +0200
From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Rules for submitting patches
References: <4C5F0A4A.6020004@online.no> <AANLkTin3E3AS5P0+MoHmuPfTFf9OwM4RKZRRoDAmHtmt@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin3E3AS5P0+MoHmuPfTFf9OwM4RKZRRoDAmHtmt@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: joska@online.no
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On 08/08/2010 10:29 PM, Miro Kropacek wrote:
>> I noticed that Mikro has removed the following phrase twice from the wiki:
> No no, this is a big misunderstanding! I removed *duplicates* (in the
> both cases), when  you check the page, it's there! Of course, it makes
> sense and it's common rule for all projects. I would be crazy if I
> remove it with no reason...

I'm sorry, you are right :-) I did not spot this.

Jo Even