From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Aug 28 18:27:30 2010 X-SourceIP: 77.251.205.36 Message-ID: <4C798CAF.6080202@chello.nl> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:24:47 +0200 From: Henk Robbers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES info line hight References: <0002894a.01c73262a882@smtp.freeola.net> <6f92e0fc626689677f61d24b62e6c739-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXF5bVkYJXV1oA1ZUMl5dSUcLVlldQ18=-webmailer2@server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de> <8E9ED41A-A4E4-4ED6-9549-CD50BA7535EE@gmail.com> <4C79833B.9070104@chello.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=O+FWVpunvrlG1gSnSO6WiIQ7o0MJ4laHqrEcUJ8XjIg= c=1 sm=0 a=OVKR1Snle-MA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=HpkHhv1iAAAA:20 a=JxdZti4tAAAA:8 a=JPPUTZovZwIKFL2bdZ0A:9 a=jIobjL79IDznLNsWMsAA:7 a=XqnEixYaT8ZJR610iHVq1cb9tP4A:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: h.robbers@chello.nl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: m0n0 wrote: > Am Samstag, den 28.08.2010, 23:44 +0200 schrieb Henk Robbers > : > > >>The infoline has been standard height for 25 years. >>I write programs for myself in which I put information in >>the info line that is important to me and I dont want to be >>confronted with a sudden change of taste by a implementor. >>A different height suddenly distorts my experience with >>my own programs. I simply can not accept that. >>Nobody has the right to oppose such a experience >>on me unless it is easy avoidable. > > > But what if someone likes to have the small infoline - AND likes to use > your tool? I stated explicitely "programs for myself". By which I mean programs I wont publish and hence are unknown to others. I wanted to make it clear that the change of look is not a question that is subject too public agreement, it directly affects someones personal space. Is the person lost then? "easy avoidable" means that there is choice. -- Groeten; Regards. Henk Robbers. http://members.chello.nl/h.robbers Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger; http://digger.atari.org A Home Cooked C compiler: AHCC; http://ahcc.atari.org