From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Aug 8 19:38:50 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=cCyUjmGajfeg0UEAJKZc1w2EdUsrJgaWaM9RHzjuaA8=; b=rQs7SsBilv08Teyb7eMqR2JVrQ2+YZru9goosoyhAT8eZMr6T9aWe8Lo2itVbSI5sk jpCOfrx9QpEWMTh+kDA8e5b2DO8UnndgnjGmkl6DbG/5QG+QM24TNPI6wfMAlABIpld4 jB4EXsRZhcHCo5BFp4exj2VZop38NtyH5AhZU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=UekRrxGPA5JIkGEsA2N17Y3Ob13W0iSCfvp16O6dtD8XtoNafXmqmA+4tjN0oeaO91 RlT20aLVdn1ssDhyRWYjUntTXElA8ZRjWfu+If7uzJ49XrcRyIZHnz99NMrC9j8PArQT XJTIv9aEzNi9UsiMfU4cRZ+DqsF5TgXCqGJjc= Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES: menus in windows - window handle? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: <4C5F3DEB.3030103@chello.nl> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 01:34:48 +0200 Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Message-Id: <7658A413-7447-48DB-B653-BDAAA0AF413C@gmail.com> References: <162697.648254351-sendEmail@descaro> <4C59C37A.8090407@online.no> <4C5F1671.1080107@online.no> <4C5F2E60.8020509@chello.nl> <0EB389F9-5D48-4F08-B7C2-3F6578EF247B@gmail.com> <4C5F3DEB.3030103@chello.nl> To: Henk Robbers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o78NcnJa005448 9 aug 2010 kl. 01.29 skrev Henk Robbers: > Peter Persson wrote: > >> In my case, I needed to clone the menu resource anyway, since the contents of the menu depends on the contents of the window. > > That is a valid reason. I was thinking you did it only for the > sake of identification of window. For sake of argument - let's say that was the case. What was I supposed to do? :-) -- PeP