From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Aug 7 15:41:46 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=wEr/9r6ZPD79PiloRIaP0tz9FCRamBrX4C1bT1PUJYM=; b=Q2rh8X57QBvXq72TWZSOgdIHwyKm9nKHIjTSJ6vqT1j5TZ6pz2Euk0tcPKy83Su8xh 2QdfWvZPDYDqrkg/EGy7Ic6wRNGFBkJ9bo7ncaALMO3sqlfWze8yei2Lu3gO9og/ajDF 0oxQt9fEPYo0itE6tA/JTXQQReHHEmDjrobpQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=OygEgVVKWAeMxhF4I4EDTVoLL/P23l1cYRy5DdLsDEUWKFl6E1MKgToByMRYczktWM JmjQykI9KQ4vgVxAH1HbQtpTnZYdP83VSrZBJY+dzUOgyRDbH/IgXT7jU0ebi7W1Hmxs egIo6k6FmNW4eOocKfExird5ge9e+CdtS83zk= Subject: Re: [MiNT] 1.17 Release - XaAES Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 21:40:11 +0200 Cc: mint Message-Id: <7C84B7AA-48E1-4054-9BE0-848B01F0E80A@gmail.com> References: To: Paul Wratt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o77JfjHL032240 7 aug 2010 kl. 21.28 skrev Paul Wratt: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Peter Persson wrote: >> I've noticed this too, but I'm under the impression that it is a VDI problem rather than a bug in XaAES. >> >> -- PeP >> > no, not fVDI, there are even some comments in the code about it, its > basically a window calculation issue (from memory), but I think "drop > shadow" has an effect on it > > Although looking at the screen shot I notice 2 seperate things going > on with that 1 pixel (sometimes white, sometimes black), it is related > to redraws of windows > > NOTE that the screen shot was only with the right border "over-draw". > I think it "under-draws" on the left, if so, that imply correct width > but 1 pixel offset > > BTW I have seen/used an XaAES that does not have this bug, but that > would have been at least before Christmas, and might have been a build > I had tweaked The same issue is present on 1-16-cur + fVDI + Aranym. It's not present on 1-16-cur + Hades + NVDI, 1-16-cur + CT60 + NVDI or 1-17-cur + CT60 + NVDI. I'd say it's a VDI problem. -- PeP