From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Aug 24 06:46:06 2010
To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] AES related question: How to keep track if my application
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:44:24 +0200
From: m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net>
Reply-To: ole@monochrom.net
In-Reply-To: <569388.163599314-sendEmail@descaro>
References: <569388.163599314-sendEmail@descaro>
Message-ID: <7dbb5e254d781a3afda8d46ce220f8a5-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXF5bVkYLV0FzCTpUX1ddR0EEWVxd-webmailer2@server08.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
X-Sender: ole@monochrom.net
User-Agent: Host Europe Webmailer/2.0
X-HE-Access: Yes
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ole@monochrom.net;1282646664;d058e47d;
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: ole@monochrom.net
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>


Am Dienstag, den 24.08.2010, 12:03 +0200 schrieb "Helmut Karlowski"
<helmut.karlowski@ish.de>:

>> Sorry, that seems wrong to me - I should call EvntMulti with longer
>> timeouts to give more CPU time to the Rendering/Network code? That's not
> 
> That's what I thought.

That's maybe true for an mult-threaded environment...?
 
> When it works it's ok, just find the best compromise between overhead
> and response-time. 
> BTW: I don't think evnt_multi alone consumes much
> CPU, to me it's like a second-layer-scheduler with refined
> application-control. But I hope you use the improved version with the
> pointer instead of 33 parameters on stack?

I'm using the WinDom version, haven't looked in the internals. 

Greets,
m