From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Aug 3 11:50:04 2010 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <90e6ba6154c2b93dd0048ced3a1c@google.com> Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:47:07 +0000 Subject: [MiNT] System security. From: ctziotzis@gmail.com To: mint Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6154c2b93db5048ced3a19 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ctziotzis@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: --90e6ba6154c2b93db5048ced3a19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Hi, One very interesting question was asked at the atariage forums yesterday. About the system security of an Atari especially when that is on a network. The way I understand it when we load an AES we are basically roots. TOS and TOSfs drives aren't very secure at all. So, how secure is a MiNT system? Regards Christos --90e6ba6154c2b93db5048ced3a19 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,
One very interesting question was asked at the atariage forums yes= terday. About the system security of an Atari especially when that is on a = network. The way I understand it when we load an AES we are basically roots= . TOS and TOSfs drives aren't very secure at all.
So, how secure = is a MiNT system?

Regards
Christos --90e6ba6154c2b93db5048ced3a19--