From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Aug 10 13:53:14 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=ABxi/9GWrBPOfugbOwct+RUu4EUZwlb7JfQMCSG0y8A=; b=Pxw7EfdInixDQANiaUfSKvd6sKTyIgfA9De5yUsRO49fT8aAWcal7+um+3OUaAT7ua OxTQPhOyCsi59WXDNHcEVkyMfoRrnyMAh55B7LZnO5r0USKSK8tueH1DvWDLDlfmfXjs 1HjkxvAFDW7KF0kSjUDHio009bzfZBfaETOfU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=iHtthmepZKxDXhtQGjOABOZIK0SXH0gKtSE2Z5OYWzsgHcJr3Sd+TUoM6i9mRRbVG8 30ZzqUHv7Beh8SaP0VtrMAOkmPVf8Rayniy23sN3fO4dS/e9XHftLJyKnC5tf6aQYawV qFu8/4KDUn2FItO6iSG7i48DHmMhkm/IXSw9U= From: Peter Persson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [MiNT] twcall.prg vs. AV-protocoll? (Conholio) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:51:02 +0200 Message-Id: To: mint Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o7AHrDo7011439 Hi, AFAIK twcall.prg is used to launch TOS/TTP-binaries into a TosWin console window. Should I mimic this approach in Conholio, or could it be done using the AV-protocol instead? (note - I know absolutely nothing about the AV-protocoll, maybe it's not applicable at all?). -- PeP