From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Aug 30 08:39:20 2010 Message-ID: From: "Jo Even Skarstein" To: References: <30082010141846i2C005937V30@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <30082010141846i2C005937V30@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [MiNT] Library Editojbc.slb under XAAES and Jinnee Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:38:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: -------------------------------------------------- From: "Gerhard Stoll" Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:15 PM To: "Jo Even Skarstein" Subject: Re: [MiNT] Library Editojbc.slb under XAAES and Jinnee >> If the alert is not displayed when DEBUG_LEVEL is set to 0 (no >> debugging), then the behaviour appears to be correct to me. > > Then should someone look what is now the default from the > DEBUG_LEVEL and set him to 0. Hmm... I'm not so sure. What else is reported at this debugging level? It might be sensible to have some debug output by default. >> The real problem is Jinnee attempting to load editobjc.slb without >> checking that MagiC is present. > > Why should Jinnee do this?[1] It knows what to do if the >From the MagiC programming docs: "How do I recognise whether the functions are present? ===================================================== The editable object is available from MagiC 5.20 onwards. As it is implemented as part of the shared library (SLB or SharedLib), one only needs to open the library with:" Jinnee fails to check properly for the presence of this object. It is *not* available when editobjc.slb is loaded, but when running under MagiC >= 5.2 AND editobjc.slb is present. But there is no point in discussing that. The sources for Jinnee are lost forever so it can't be changed anyway. Jo Even