From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Aug 25 17:24:29 2010 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:22:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Keith Scroggins To: Peter Slegg cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] New RPMs to be uploaded shortly... In-Reply-To: <0064d1bf.01c7326238e6@smtp.freeola.net> Message-ID: References: <0064d1bf.01c7326238e6@smtp.freeola.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: kws@radix.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Hello Peter, If you install the GCC 4.5.1 RPM, it will overwrite/upgrade, so that GCC 2.95.3 is now gone, at least the C/C++ pieces. The gcc2 packages will put the older GCC back in place with a slightly different name, requiring a user to specify it to use it. This is one way other systems have multiple GCCs, there are some other ways of doing this, but with RPMs, I though this was the easiest. So, GCC 4.5.1 would be default, with the possibility og GCC 2.95.3 being secondary. Keith On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Peter Slegg wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:38:37 -0400 (EDT), Keith Scroggins wrote: >> Forgot to add, currently sitting in: >>> GCC 2.95.3 to co-exist with GCC 4.5.1. I have not really tested it much. >>> >>> Keith > > If gcc4.5.1 is installed does it replace 2.95 or install alongside it ? > > Peter > > > > >