From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Sep 19 08:51:09 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Vka61FMq3jAQe9K9hodzzUz9m9f6XMIqdDuhBrAnY68=; b=QFafCZEDg+yT8ngmPtD/Qzh9RnIEVBDPNkm3ghmxyHQEoKD4/O2QmJOrrtNEksDjXC b5L1Ju2PMWSUA/JyDIehiuPOkr42coOfLa0uzDFq93dhqdsPa9lOIMrBpD1DpXoQXbzj MslHEmw3qIMt33mKvk8Mdc6WNEz3SFLmlBDtA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=xDkX2qcO7SMq5o4oza9FnAp3mXTe/JMgV7TxhCKcbbvpFRT6gO0gSuZAkMW4gLbss3 3BqOThZos1fDTrnhSoYcDqqcTPuywZK4i9sdRX8MdlY2ijLPupXaLDDTzLW4/lxOoAB4 xBlTTQfQUcSgDVwUy7ILht5JuSTQ14TDGWWFk= Subject: Re: [MiNT] Ctrl+Alt+Q deactivated Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:47:26 +0200 Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Message-Id: <0ED61A94-20A0-43BF-BFB9-B7854FB585E7@gmail.com> References: <4C95D6D3.4060602@online.no> <4C95FD87.2090003@abbuc.de> <8AD02242-4D13-4925-A538-57F7D31A8C40@gmail.com> To: "Helmut Karlowski" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o8JCp88J015503 19 sep 2010 kl. 14.38 skrev Helmut Karlowski: > So it's best as it is now. > > I mean: what's the problem in typing C-A-F,A-Q? If someone finds this inconvenient, I cannot help. Well, even if I agree with you on this particular matter, a touch of humbleness wouldn't hurt. Somehow it feels like changes are no longer proposed, evaluated, approved and implemented. They're just implemented - and everyone has to accept it. If anyone disagrees - tough luck - it's already in CVS. No offense, it's just my impression of the current development flow. I'm not sure I'm 100% comfortable with it. -- PeP